Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Advances in Developing Human Resources
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Umble, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dooley, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Planning Human Resource Development and Continuing Professional Education Programs That Use Educational Technologies: Voices That Must be Heard

Karl E. Umble

North Carolina Institute for Public Health at the Univesity of North Carolina-Chapel Hill School of Public Health; Department of Health Policy and Administration

Larry M. Dooley

Human Resource Development Program in Texas A&M University–s College of Education and Human Development; Board of the Academy of Human Resource Development(AHRD); Board of the Academy of Human Resource Development Foundation

The problem and the solution. Many human resource development and continuing professional education programs that use technology lack quality and are not fully implemented because development and delivery processes do not work well thereby alienating learners and/or faculty. Many others are implemented but not sustained, often because the program design is fundamentally unsustainable. One general way of describing the problem is to say that when planners design the program, processes, and business model, they often do not take into account the interests of all internal and external stakeholders. This article focuses on how planning models that foreground learning but neglect faculty, staff, and organizational interests undermine learning, because they undercut implementation and sustainability. Planning models that foreground and balance stakeholder interests support learning because they support implementation and sustainability.

Key Words: continuing professional education • human resource development • program planning models • technology

Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 6, No. 1, 86-100 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1523422303260419


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Advances in Developing Human ResourcesHome page
B. J. Daley and L. Jeris
Boundary Spanning
Advances in Developing Human Resources, February 1, 2004; 6(1): 5 - 8.
[PDF]


Home page
Advances in Developing Human ResourcesHome page
L. Jeris and B. J. Daley
Orienteering for Boundary Spanning: Reflections on the Journey to Date and Suggestions for Moving Forward
Advances in Developing Human Resources, February 1, 2004; 6(1): 101 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]