| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Planning Human Resource Development and Continuing Professional Education Programs That Use Educational Technologies: Voices That Must be HeardNorth Carolina Institute for Public Health at the Univesity of North Carolina-Chapel Hill School of Public Health; Department of Health Policy and Administration
Human Resource Development Program in Texas A&M Universitys College of Education and Human Development; Board of the Academy of Human Resource Development(AHRD); Board of the Academy of Human Resource Development Foundation The problem and the solution. Many human resource development and continuing professional education programs that use technology lack quality and are not fully implemented because development and delivery processes do not work well thereby alienating learners and/or faculty. Many others are implemented but not sustained, often because the program design is fundamentally unsustainable. One general way of describing the problem is to say that when planners design the program, processes, and business model, they often do not take into account the interests of all internal and external stakeholders. This article focuses on how planning models that foreground learning but neglect faculty, staff, and organizational interests undermine learning, because they undercut implementation and sustainability. Planning models that foreground and balance stakeholder interests support learning because they support implementation and sustainability.
Key Words: continuing professional education human resource development program planning models technology
Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 6, No. 1,
86-100 (2004) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
